Perkins School for the Blind Secondary school student Robert Evans shares his science fair project.
Forensic chemistry is the analytic study of substances that could easily be misidentified or confused, and finding their identity. Forensic chemists analyze the physical and chemical properties of different materials in order to identify them correctly where one or more materials may have similar properties. Forensic science is crucial to law enforcement because it has improved the efficiency of crime solving drastically. Most often the strength of a prosecution relies on the physical evidence collected. Using that evidence, forensic chemists can help connect the evidence to the perpetrator of the crime and to the victim. Any physical evidence collected is sealed in special containers to prevent contamination and degradation, and is then catalogued carefully. A well-trained forensic chemist can determine the composition and nature of materials, as well as predict their sources, and match substances sample against sample.
Poisons were first used by early Egyptians, and the ancient Greeks and Romans. Democritus was most likely the first chemist to study poisons, and he communicated many of his findings to Hippocrates. Poisons were used both for murder and execution; Greek philosopher Socrates was condemned to death by drinking hemlock, which was a popular poison. Another common poison during that time period was arsenic. Before the development of systematic, scientific criminal investigation, guilt was determined by mostly circumstantial evidence and hearsay, because it was the only information that they had. The Blandy trial of 1752 was the first ever chemical test for poison, and the Marsh Test in 1836 was the first reliable analysis that determined whether or not arsenic was present in the body of a victim.
Forensic chemistry encompasses organic and inorganic analysis, arson investigation, toxicology, serology, and other different skill sets and techniques. Each type of analysis uses different techniques and instrumentation.
Picture this scenario: A woman is sent to the ER with complaints of severe abdominal pain, lethargy, and Tinitus. She started feeling poorly while baking for her grandchildren. Suspecting a drug interaction, doctors question the woman and find out that she takes no medications aside for Aspirin for her arthritis. Because she cannot swallow pills well she buys a powdered form and keeps it in the same cabinet as her baking products, which are table salt, table sugar, and cornstarch. She also admits to testing her baking. Knowing this information, doctors think they know the cause and pump her stomach.
In this situation, the role of a forensic chemist would be to identify which substance is which by examining various physical and chemical properties: solubility, pH, density, reactivity, etc.
The reason I chose this experiment is because I’ve always been fascinated by how modern detectives use forensics to solve crimes. Being a very analytical person I wanted to see what it was like to be in their shoes.
You have four powder substances: table sugar, salt, cornstarch, and powdered aspirin. How can you properly identify the aspirin among of the other substances?
If aspirin has a lower pH than the other three substances, then this substance is the one that poisoned that poisoned the grandmother baking for her grandchildren.
1. Gather all necessary materials to perform the experiment.
2. Grind the aspirin using a Mortar and Pestle.
The hypothesis was supported because the aspirin indeed had a lower pH than the sucrose, cornstarch, and table salt. The acidity of the aspirin would be due to the fact that salicylic acid being one of the main ingredients.
Variables that could have possibly had an impact on the results of the experiment are the temperature of the room, the ratio of each substance to the amount of water, the acidity or basicity of the water source, and how effectively each mixture is stirred.
By Kate Fraser
Return to Accessible Science main page.